Churchill’s Bomb

By September 17, 2026No Comments

A hidden story of science, politics and war

On Sunday 4 April 1926, Winston Churchill – Chancellor of the Exchequer in the UK government – wrote an essay about quantum theory, at that time a hot topic in physics. He promptly sent it to an Oxford professor of physics to check that his (Churchill’s) understanding was correct (it was). Seven years later, Churchill chaired a discussion about the great nuclear discoveries recently made by Rutherford’s group at the Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge. Churchill was also a prolific writer about the implications of modern science for society and warfare, writing regular science columns for the News of the World, read by millions in the UK.

 

Churchill was much more interested in fundamental physics than most historians seem to realise, though they all appreciate his recognition of the importance of applying modern science and technology to warfare. He repeatedly warned in the 1930s that the nuclear age was imminent. Early in WWII, physicists in Britain showed that the Bomb could almost certainly be built. Partly because he – as prime minister – paid relatively little attention to the speculative weapon, the initiative soon passed to the US, which had the vast resources essential to realise the venture quickly. British scientists played only a minor role in it. Churchill dismissed warnings from the Danish physicist Niels Bohr that Anglo-American nuclear policy would lead to an arms race. After Churchill returned to power in 1951, he became the first British leader to have nuclear weapons, and also commissioned the H-bomb. Appalled by the prospect of thermonuclear war, he ended his political career as a pioneer of détente.

WHAT REVIEWERS SAID

A story as gripping as it is elegantly argued ... a wonderful companion piece to one of the most authoritative books on this subject, Richard Rhodes's epic The Making of the Atomic Bomb.

Lisa JardineFinancial Times

Graham Farmelo's very fine book ... illuminates the nexus between science, politics, war, and even literature better than anything I have read for some time. The issues it raises are both eternal and especially pressing now. It is not yet Book of the Year time but this has to be a contender.

Peter ForbesThe Independent

In this terrific book, Farmelo ... demonstrates that although principles and evidence often shape the relationship between science and policy, personality and politics play just as large a role.

Lawrence FreedmanForeign Affairs

A remarkable and important book ... Graham Farmelo draws a highly readable and original portrait of Churchill as he dealt in secret with scientists and politicans over the development of nuclear weapons

Claire Tomalin

Superbly written, with a Lindemann-like flair for the translation of scientific data into layman's terms, it is a narrative driven by personalities ... and studded with memorable cameos of the scientists, politicians and bureaucrats involved.

Paul AddisonLiterary Review

This is a complex and engrossing history with obvious geopolitical import, but what's most interesting is the human drama involving Churchill, FDR, and the constellation of scientific egos circling around them. Farmelo also wonderfully draws out Churchill's surprising futurism...

Nicholas MancusiDaily Beast

The Strangest Man ... is one of the best biographies of a scientist that I know. [Churchill's Bomb], like that one, shows a keen sense of the human comedy. Who were these people, and why did they behave the way they did?

Jeremy BernsteinWall Street Journal

A terrific narrative, which casts a new light on Churchill, the Allied atomic bomb project, and the history and aftermath of the Second World War.

Michael Frayn

Superb ... Few writers can make the mechanics of H-bomb production interesting: Farmelo can. Churchill’s Bomb, equally as good as his award-winning biography of the physicist Paul Dirac ... sheds light on a little-known aspect of Churchill’s life and does so with flair and narrative verve.

Ian ThomsonDaily Telegraph

In 'this dazzling book' ... 'Farmelo recounts this important story with skill and erudition

Piers BrendonGuardian

Absorbing ... Farmelo's account of Churchill's atomic dreams perfectly captures the essence of the man and of the science of the day.

Robin McKieObserver

Churchill's Bomb tells [a] dramatic story and tells it brilliantly... Farmelo ingeniously interweaves the narratives of the nuclear scientists, many of them Jewish refugees from Germany, with that of Churchill in war and peace. As the Americans enter the picture the story becomes fiendishly complicated, but the author never loses the thread.

Daniel JohnsonThe Times (UK)

Compelling.... The value of Farmelo's book is in its meticulous attention to the contingencies, accidents, uncertainties, inconsistencies and idiosyncratic personalities in the story of how Britain didn't get the Bomb during the war and how it did get it afterwards. It could all have turned out differently – but it didn't.

Steven Shapin (Harvard University)LRB

Intriguing .... [the book's] brilliance lies in the way the story is told, for it is a tale not just of physics or politics but also, more importantly, of people.

Gerard DeGrootPhysics World

... a page-turner ... scrupulously researched and superbly written ... Churchill's Bomb is a powerful and moving contribution to literature about the 20th century and to biographical and historical writing...

Vin ArtheyThe Scotsman

Churchill's Bomb is an outstanding work on international politics and the history of science... It deserves a wide audience.

Chris WrigleyJournal of Modern History